|
|
|
Positions
on Public Policy
Brownfields
The Council of Great Lakes Industries (CGLI) supports a cooperative, multi-stakeholder
approach to the redevelopment of brownfields, which encourages a regulatory
atmosphere that is beneficial to sustainable development.
Background
For many decades society has been developing
suburban and rural landspaces, as a result of expansion of population
and economic activity, which has consumed prime farmland and affected
various ecosystems. Industry has expanded into previously undeveloped
greenfield sites, while at the same time left vacant industrial properties
in urban centers. The brownfield legacy includes erosion of city tax bases,
localized unemployment, diminished property values and deterioration of
supporting infrastructure.
Position
The CGLI believes that the reuse of brownfields
is congruent with sustainable development and should be encouraged. A
cooperative approach, which builds partnerships between public and private
entities, must be nurtured to encourage regulatory change to assure brownfield
redevelopment. An essential enabler for sustainable development is a regulatory
atmosphere which will stimulate industrial redevelopment on vacant brownfields
and encourage private investments. Providing resources to develop companion
retail, housing, and recreational opportunities, support services and
goods will further stimulate the economy by creating jobs, thereby increasing
the tax base and a rise in property values.
Reuse of brownfields can be encouraged by a change
in government policies to: 1.) minimize significant financial risks and
uncertainty currently associated with these properties under existing
environmental laws; 2.) provide incentives to encourage responsible parties,
land developers, and financial institutions to economically remediate,
develop and revitalize brownfields.
Recommendations
- Land-use planning must encourage sustainable
land-use and community growth. City planning should manage community
growth such that the present needs do not compromise the availability
of suitable (land) resources, a healthy environment for, and the economic
well being of future generations. The business and regulatory agenda
must balance a commitment to the environmental protection in a manner
that is cost-effective and consistent with sustainable community growth.
The use of former industrial brownfields, remediated to a targeted industrial
land-use standard, is protective of the environment and provides important
community benefits.
- Remove barriers that inhibit prospective
development of brownfields. The current interpretation of common
law as well as various provincial statutory and regulatory schemes generally
impose barriers for faultless developers and financial institutions
to finance, remediate and develop contaminated brownfields. Potential
purchasers, developers or lenders should not be held legally liable
for past environmental pollution to which they have neither contributed
nor caused.
- Provide financial incentive and/or minimize
financial risk for brownfield redevelopers. In the United States,
tax codes should be amended to provide tax incentives to parties who
revitalize brownfields. Risk to financial lending institutions connected
with these developments must be minimized to make funds readily available
irrespective of the level of contamination at the site.
- Promote risk assessment in determining standards
for end-use of the brownfield. Reasonable risk assessment methodology
used to determine clean-up criteria should be based on sound science
and be consistent with the end-use of the property; residential, commercial,
industrial or recreational. CGLI supports clean-up standards that reflect
land-use alternatives for brownfield redevelopment.
Summary
The Council of Great Lakes Industries supports
the reuse and revitalization of brownfields since it represents a
significant growth opportunity for both the present and long term
economy and quality of life in urban areas. Environmental regulations
should show remediation and reuse of currently contaminated or abandoned
industrial sites as an alternative to continued development of greenfield
areas. Incorporating the concepts of land use planning for sustainable
development, financial/tax incentives and risk assessment based on
site clean-up and environmental management standards will make this
goal attainable in a manner that is protective of the economy, human
health and the environment.
September 1995
|
|
|