Protecting the Great Lakes Environment
Milestones of Progress


Working to Achieve Regional Environmental Goals

A primary mission of CGLI is to work with governments and public policy makers to establish sound environmental management policies and standards. In addition we have established benchmarks and guidelines against which member companies can build and compare their own environmental protection programs.

Assisted by a grant from the Great Lakes Protection Fund, CGLI established a framework for Total Quality Environmental Management programs which has won worldwide acclaim. Using it, industries can judge for themselves whether or not their environmental programs contain the essential elements to provide "total quality" in their pursuit of excellence in the environmental protection area.

Individually, CGLI member companies work hard to provide environmental improvements. Their programs include formal corporate policies, detailed pollution prevention and continuous improvement programs, monitoring and reporting efforts. These programs and this "corporate environmental ethic" have lead to important environmental improvements.


The Nature of Pollutant Reduction Programs

CGLI members have accomplished pollution prevention and reduction goals through a number of means. They include:

However, results are more important than the programs. U.S. and Canadian government reporting programs provide one measure of environmental progress accomplished through these efforts. Others are found in industry sector reports, from data provided by individual companies and in observations made by environmental and ecosystem scientists and researchers. This progress report provides some examples.


Reports from Governments

Two reporting programs which track industrial chemical releases within Canada and the United States are ARET and the TRI program. In Canada, ARET participation is completely voluntary. In the U.S., TRI reporting is mandatory, but in many cases chemical release reductions are voluntary. In both countries, substantial chemical release reduction progress has been made. Details and results are summarized below.

Programs aimed at specific hazardous substances must include participation of multi- stakeholders as well as government cooperation in order to accomplish specific objectives. Examples of successes reported by the U.S. and Canadian governments from the use these wide ranging programs include:


Industrial Sector Programs

Each industrial sector has a unique set of chemical release reduction circumstances and opportunities. Through trade associations and other alliances, industrial organizations addressing the same or similar issues often initiate sector wide release reduction programs. These provide an opportunity to share technical support, tracking and public reporting functions. Here are some examples.


Individual Company Efforts

The collective results described above come from the combined efforts of individual companies and, most notably, the individual employees within each company. The examples listed below provide only a keyhole view of the thousands of individual efforts which, combined, produce aggregate successes. Cited for each of the pollution prevention categories, they provide a view of the diverse nature and wide range of the individual efforts. CGLI member companies welcome your inquiry regarding their specific programs and accomplishments. Please feel free to contact them.

Use Reductions and Substitutions:
A satellite microwave device manufacturer voluntarily stopped the use of ozone-depleting degreasing chemicals, completely, three years prior to a Canadian regulatory initiative which would have required a partial phase-out(11).

Process Changes and Pollution Prevention Efforts:
Employee developed process and manufacturing program changes at a vinyl resin manufacturing facility cut vinyl chloride releases by 99 percent. New lab procedures at the same plant resulted in 92 percent lower lab solvent emissions(12).

Waste Stream Recovery, Reuse and Recycling:
A steel company improved the capture and use of by-product gases generated in coke and iron making operations and increased energy conservation activities. As a result, the amount of energy needed to make a tonne of steel has been reduced by 3.6 percent(13).

Virtual Elimination Programs:
Canada's largest photo finishing company, with the help of a large chemical company, developed a near zero discharge system which uses nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and distillation to remove impurities from waste water allowing it to be recirculated back into film developing processes. As a result, waste water containing photo finishing related contaminants are no longer discharged to municipal sewer systems(14).

Green Product Design and Production:
Vehicles produced at one major U.S./Canada automaker contain many parts and components made of recycled materials; and the vehicles themselves are 75 percent recyclable. Lamp housings and air cleaner assemblies contain 25 percent recycled plastic. The air cleaners use reclaimed nylon derived from 27 million square feet of nylon annually. Air deflectors, baffles and splash shields are made, in part, from 360,000 reclaimed rubber tires. One manufacturing plant operated by this company is the only automotive plant in the world where every part is made of recycled materials(15).

Improved Treatment and Control Systems and Processes:
Through continuing conservation measures and controls, a major pulp and paper manufacturer, with important facilities located in the Great Lakes Region, has cut water use per ton of product by more than 70% since 1972. Many of the company's chemical, building products, and packaging materials manufacturing facilities also have installed equipment or used conservation measures to decrease use of water. Some chemical and packaging plants reclaim, treat and recycle all of their process wastewaters, making them zero discharge facilities, except for sanitary wastes(16).

Ecosystem Protection, Restoration and Improvement Programs:
A chemical company, working with a Great Lakes community and state environmental officials, converted a "brownfield" industrial site to a riverside recreation center providing both site remediation and a community asset(17).

Individual company successes, like these, provide several benefits for our Region. First, the importance of activities that create economic value while continuously reducing ecological impact and the use of resource (i.e. ecoefficiency) are clearly transmitted to employees, suppliers and customers. Second, other companies find it easier to incorporate similar changes in their capital replacement plans because capability has been demonstrated. And, most importantly, the ecosystem status reflects positive results.


Results Evident in the Environment

Environmental monitoring, assessment and tracking programs, conducted by government, academic and industry scientists are documenting the progress which we have made. Here are some examples.


CGLI and It's Member Companies Work for Further Progress

There are many more examples which demonstrate the outcome from committed environmental stewardship. And, it will not end here. We are looking ahead to additional environmental protection opportunities. Here are some of these steps.



REFERENCES

  1. Environmental Leaders 2, ARET Voluntary Action on Toxics Substances, ARET Secretariat, Ottawa, Ontario, January 1997.
  2. 1995 Toxics Release Inventory Public Data Release, U.S. EPA, April 14, 1997.
  3. Remarks by David Ulrich, Acting National Program Manager, U.S. EPA at the IJC 25th Anniversary Public Forum, Niagara Falls Ontario, November 1, 1997.
  4. Remarks by John Mills, Minister, Environment Canada, at the IJC 25th Anniversary Public Forum, Niagara Falls Ontario, November 1, 1997.
  5. U.S. EPA, Regulatory Impact of Proposed Effluent Guidelines and NESHAP for the Pulp, Paper and Paperboard Industry, November 1993.
  6. U.S. EPA, Fact Sheet, EPA's Final Pulp, Paper and Paperboard "Cluster Rule" - Overview, EPA-821-F-97-010, November 1997.
  7. Reducing Emissions 1995 Emissions Inventory and Five-Year Projections., Canadian Chemical Producers' Association, Ottawa, Ontario.
  8. Graves, Gregory; Formaldehyde Emission Control Via Resin Technology - North American Practices; Proceedings of the 27th International Particleboard/Composite Materials Symposium; Washington State University, Wood Materials and Engineering Laboratory; March 30,31, April 1, 1993.
  9. American Forest and Paper Association, Washington D.C.
  10. Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, Calgary, Alberta
  11. Great Lakes Pollution Prevention Centre, Sarnia, Ontario/Varian Canada Inc., Georgetown, Ontario
  12. Geon Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio
  13. Dofasco, Inc., Hamilton, Ontario
  14. Blacks Photo Corporation, Toronto/Dow Canada
  15. Ford Motor Company, Detroit, Michigan
  16. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia
  17. BASF, Parsippany, New Jersey
  18. Focus, July/August, 1997, pages 17-18, IJC Great Lakes Regional Office, Windsor Ontario.
  19. Persistent Chlorinated Compounds in wildlife: Trends in North America and Europe. PTI Environmental Services, May 1997, Prepared for the Chlorine Chemistry Council.



Back - Home Page

For more information about the Council of Great Lakes Industries and its programs contact:

Council of Great Lakes Industries
3600 Green Ct.
PO Box 134006
Ann Arbor, MI 48113-4006
telephone 734-663-1944 *   fax 734-663-2424
email: StraderCo@aol.com